Does uBLAS embrace C++ Core Guidelines?

--===============7817676155668791410==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f99ef505b7eea13d"

--000000000000f99ef505b7eea13d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I=E2=80=99ve been away from C++ for a quite few years, and it seems like a =
lot has
happened to my old friend C++98. As I start to dive into C++17 and beyond,
I=E2=80=99m curious about the C++ community=E2=80=99s adoption of the C++ C=
ore Guidelines
and enforcement tools like clang-tidy. The uBLAS community is of particular
interest to me, because the things we do focus on innovative use of
language features to squeeze numerical performance out of C++ and not the
typical GUI or network application efforts of so many other projects.

To what extent is uBLAS embracing the Core ideal?

Sean Reilly

--000000000000f99ef505b7eea13d
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I=E2=80=99ve been away from C++ for a quite few years, and it seems like a =
lot has happened to my old friend C++98. As I start to dive into C++17 and =
beyond, I=E2=80=99m curious about the C++ community=E2=80=99s adoption of t=
he C++ Core Guidelines and enforcement tools like clang-tidy. The uBLAS com=
munity is of particular interest to me, because the things we do focus on i=
nnovative use of language features to squeeze numerical performance out of =
C++ and not the typical GUI or network application efforts of so many other=
 projects.=C2=A0<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">To what=C2=A0=
extent is uBLAS embracing the Core ideal?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div>=
<div dir=3D"auto">Sean Reilly</div>

--000000000000f99ef505b7eea13d--

--===============7817676155668791410==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline