Re: Any objections to making C++14 the current baseline for Boost support and testing?

John Maddock via Boost-users <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.boost.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 06/05/2022 09:25, Martijn Otto via Boost-users wrote:
> I'm not against breaking compatibility with older c++-versions at all,
> but given that c++-14 has so few new features compared to c++-11 I do
> think that it may be better to bump the baseline to c++-17 directly.
>
> Whether we should do that _now_ is another matter. IMNSHO c++17 has
> been out for long enough that you'd expect most people to now have a

There's been some discussion on the develop list about this: I confess I 
was in your camp, but it's been (correctly) pointed out to me that C++14 
is the std version that actually made many of the C++11 features usable ;)

Plus compiler support for gcc and msvc tended to arrive at both C++14 
and 11 together in the same release (gcc had pre-C++11 support earlier, 
but there are enough bugs for it for us to not want to be targeting 
pre-gcc-5).  Both compilers are also c++14 by default at present, I 
realize that will change shortly, but we're not quite there yet.

Thanks, John.

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.