Re: Can SIMD in boost unordered be disabled without disabling SIMD for full compile.
Ivan Matek via Boost-users <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:21:17 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.boost.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB=+0+M+Dhaa35DkO_SowWi89TNbC=n_JnQ0-YnO3iwwKOEdCA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:12 AM Joaquin M López Muñoz < [email protected]> wrote: > May I suggest that you use boost::unordered_map instead of > boost::unordered_flat_map > for those small maps and see if this improves the performance of your > program? > > Thank you for the suggestion, I was hoping to keep all the elements sequentially in memory(general preference to make efficient use of cache, hard to microbenchmark), I will probably just stick to linear search or try my luck with flat_map(that in my experience has quite bad performance, but might work fine for this case). regards, Ivan _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users