Re: [PATCHES] documentation update
Nis Martensen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.cairo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20120308211427.GA11893@faeton> |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 07:07:21PM +0100, Uli Schlachter wrote: > Patches 1, 4 (and others): I don't have much clue about gtk-doc, but these > definitely looks better with the colon. :-) The since tags are not recognized by gtk-doc without the colon. > Patch 6: What exactly is the confusion? Is this fixing a doxygen-ism? This fixes a gtk-doc warning: src/cairo/doc/public/../../src/cairo-gl.h:58: warning: Symbol name not found at the start of the comment block. > Patch 10: Another instance of "no clue about gtk-doc", but I think it should be > safe to assume you know what you are doing. Gtk-doc on my system pretty-prints the <programlisting>s with syntax highlighting and prepended line numbers, and does not preserve all white space. In some cases the tag is used for non-code snippets where white space preservation is wanted, and line numbers are not. The <screen> tag fits these cases better. Found via: <http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch02.html#s.line-specific> > > One of the patches (ensure compatibility spelling) also > > adapts code, not sure if this is ok. > > I assume this refers to patch 12? > > Patch 12: Looks good. Only touches private headers and if the result compiles, > everything is fine... Did not test. > This series has 22 patches, but the git patch files say "[PATCH xx/25]", where > three patches lost? Intentionally not sent. They were my initial attempts at this: > > doc/public/cairo-sections.txt still wants an update. I'm not sure > > about the correct sections for the "unused" symbols. Who takes care > > of that? > > Good question. Tell me when you figured it out. :-) Heh :) Thanks, Nis -- cairo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cairographics.org/mailman/listinfo/cairo