Re: ANN: "Caskbench" performance benchmark
Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.cairo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:38:16PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:01:25PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > Apart from the stars test, cairo-gl did better all-around than cairo > > image. And for gradients and image manipulation it's profoundly faster. > > Now, I haven't tested against GLX but this makes me wonder if this would > > translate into significantly better performance for, say, Inkscape? If > > so, should we maybe be advocating cairo-gl/cairo-egl more heavily here? > > I notice you don't actually synchronise the rendering pipeline before > measuring the throughput performance. That would be worth checking. To illustrate that point: =0 ickle:/usr/src/caskbench$ ./src/caskbench -t egl cairo-animation 100 PASS 100 9999 cairo-bubbles 100 PASS 100 9999 0.00% cairo-circle 100 PASS 100 9999 cairo-clip 100 PASS 100 9999 0.00% cairo-cubic 100 PASS 100 9999 cairo-curves 100 PASS 100 2791 0.00% cairo-fill 100 PASS 100 9999 ... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- cairo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cairographics.org/mailman/listinfo/cairo