Re: fix alignment issue on SPARC processors
Martin Husemann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.cairo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 06:39:10PM +0100, Uli Schlachter wrote: > I would instead suggest to add a new member "int64_t data" to the struct with a > suitable comment explaining why it is of type int64_t. Instead of using > ((unsigned char *)chunk + sizeof(*chunk)) for calculating the beginning of the > data area of the chunk, the code could then use (unsigned char*)&chunk->data > which IMO is more readable anyway. This is the better way (and the data could also be a union member if it is not used elsewhere). Martin -- cairo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cairographics.org/mailman/listinfo/cairo