Re: make return buffers more obvious
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.cairo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18.12.2015 19:29, Bill Spitzak wrote: > Can const be used? Perhaps with a "#define const /*nothing*/" on > compilers that don't actually support it? Const is already used in many places, but we still have to look more carefully than just the const modifier. Im thinking of somthing like name prefixes, etc. We also lots of functions which fill out / initialize some structures, kind of constructors. I'd suggest those functions should always have that return buffer pointer as the first parameter (some already have) --mtx -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consulting +49-151-27565287 -- cairo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cairographics.org/mailman/listinfo/cairo