Re: [PATCH 24/72] drm: fixed const constraints
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.cairo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 15.01.2016 21:41, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:17:02AM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <[email protected]> > > In general I love seeing const added everywhere possible, just that I'm > concerned about any risk in breaking ABI's. The changelog entry needs > to specify that these changes either don't affect any externally > accessible ABI/API's, or that const'ing them won't cause any breakage > either in C or C++. Otherwise, it needs to explain why we don't care > about causing such breakage in this case. These are just internal functions of the DRM backend(s). And the const constraints are dictated by surface backend API. I'm just fixing the (long time unmaintained) DRM backend functions to match the API. --mtx -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consulting +49-151-27565287 -- cairo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cairographics.org/mailman/listinfo/cairo