Re: Shouldn't Cairo use/offer degrees rather than radians?
Guillermo Rodriguez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.cairo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABDcavbAo0X2Mqb-aumeK982P8xLydn_S3DiXQBAWwVT=jcCfw@mail.gmail.com> |
2017-07-03 17:14 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:02:36 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> You do realize that your claim about Cairo’s “inability to reliably >>>> draw a half circle that seamlessly connects with another half circle >>>> under any rasterization” is complete nonsense, right? >>> >>> Sigh. If you cannot specify an angle for pi for which sin(angle)==0, >>> you will have rasterizations of half circle arcs that won't line up >>> perfectly because you then cannot make the half circles butt up >>> perfectly, and "too small to be noticeable" becomes a statistic rather >>> than a static feature under rasterization. >> >> There is no such situation. > > What is wrong with this list? I don't think it is the list as a whole. But I do understand your frustration at this point. Guillermo -- cairo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cairographics.org/mailman/listinfo/cairo