Re: dithering in cairo ?

--===============0800096845==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, Aug 13 2019, Marc Jeanmougin wrote:
> CAIRO_FORMAT_T_FORMAT_MASK = 0x000f (4 bits)
> CAIRO_FORMAT_T_DITHER_MASK = 0x00f0 (4 bits)
> (and maybe CAIRO_FORMAT_T_FILTER_MASK = 0x0f00 (4 bits) (This would
> change CAIRO_FILTER_{FAST .. GAUSSIAN} = {1..6} << 8))

(This is not a very substantive comment on the proposal, and should not
be construed as approval/disapproval of the higher-level aspects of the
proposal in any way.)

That _T_ separator inside the enum label names looks pretty ugly to
me. That should be replaced with a standard _ separator.

-Carl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=fdwx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

--===============0800096845==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

LS0gCmNhaXJvIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApjYWlyb0BjYWlyb2dyYXBoaWNzLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xp
c3RzLmNhaXJvZ3JhcGhpY3Mub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vY2Fpcm8=

--===============0800096845==--