Re: tunables overridability patch vs release
"Andreas K. Huettel" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gentoo Linux |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Dienstag, 7. Juli 2026, 06:04:39 Japanische Normalzeit schrieb Adhemerval Zanella Netto: > > On 06/07/26 17:46, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > Re: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/[email protected]/ > > > > So I originally left this bit out intentionally because (1) I thought > > it would be hard, (2) it wasn't needed by most of the folks waiting > > for the tunables work, and (3) I didn't expect the patch set to land > > so close to a release. > > > > However, tunables is in and it's already hit the press[*], including > > the bit about overridability, because I implemented the parser side of > > this already (needed by the AT_SECURE parts). The patch turned out to > > be fairly simple but still needs a reviewed-by. > > > > Thus, I would like to consider this patch as "desirable" for this > > release. It was posted before the freeze, one could consider it a > > bugfix and/or continuation of the main tunables patches, or we could > > delay it and backport it later. > > > > [*] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Glibc-System-Tunables > > > > I think this should be a release blocker because it does fix some issues. > Andreas Schwab has already approved, and I only have a small comment. Makes sense. Adding it there. > > As a side-note, I am plan send some additional fixes to the system-wide > tunables that I missed on my previous reviews (I was about to re-start > it and saw that Arjun has already approved them). Some of them are > harderning, one it a performance optimization, and another is semantic > fix for the old environment variables. > > Since this is a new features, so I think we should *not* release with some > missing fixes or proper defined semantic. > -- PD Dr. Andreas K. Hüttel [email protected] Gentoo Linux developer (council, comrel, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 870 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJPBAABCAA5FiEE/Rnm0xsZLuTcY+rT3CsWIV7VQSoFAmpMUb8bFIAAAAAABAAO bWFudTIsMi41KzEuMTIsMiwyAAoJENwrFiFe1UEqu7MP/R5F0FMn0EyW5ReIhP6Q TW9EWpCO+zo0yaJrTicWDqYsYI9iCVi+C8dnzqI6CzDWb857GthoJYtJtDlRBPV/ r1XsUSzMjFRumHeipv+FDHlTSAyWhbFD/ilmZu06hVHAit2jDtpKJuwzNaFs9M9O 8WHE8/mzuv2uzOYt00o7muiSvs5/lgIK0hF5cKBzO87W8Dram1zqKZ0a0nf/L5V5 5skcFj0geM853Z+CaAzDruy3JyeTPf4uT7OL4nKeLW1M9mHC26ISDveiZmn9Q8zu hozjXn44FcssKyCePJ4OUlcA1thkNT9ufAzCD85rxGa+GB0vvoBRgaXSUB80sK8A Rw/+rAF4eVJckmLnwbKIGI81hH1yzNG7PtJcw+HwrimHoghfRFGv99vrGYuwr45n 0yVaeyyTZqA3+wBF9TJ+tRRskcelIS1nKWmx1ViHJ2chJgvVRy7ro6FYEuiZelEt TXr+lmWVZNmnPU2GTAOdR+lhJiV3EWc5okN//PAiFzolE+DRDmPOCijxRscNEa+r H3zur0CNUPoUbrXl7ApZkEeTRDwd4HB0RcYv2VKuujnrvifFxfid41PjpcTho3ch tfyKk9TTkoMpqlx4SI2rzfICTOBUapyopUnsrD7xrssTqz1eqV2NW310kQ1D9cnD PK9IsuJ1OwLKq22grWVEXhXQ =UX7N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----