Re: [PATCH] s390: Use 64bit branch relative on count instruction in strncpy-z900.S [BZ #34398]

"Andreas K. Huettel" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha
Organization Gentoo Linux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> > diff --git a/sysdeps/s390/strncpy-z900.S b/sysdeps/s390/strncpy-z900.S
> > index 6d954cf402..141cba2294 100644
> > --- a/sysdeps/s390/strncpy-z900.S
> > +++ b/sysdeps/s390/strncpy-z900.S
> > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ ENTRY(STRNCPY_Z900)
> >  	jz    .L10
> >  	stg   %r0,0(%r2,%r3)	    # store all eight to dest.
> >  	la    %r3,8(%r3)
> > -	brct  %r4,.L0
> > +	brctg %r4,.L0
> >  .L1:	ltgr  %r1,%r1
> >  	jz    .Lexit
> >  .L2:	icm   %r0,1,0(%r3)
> 
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> can I just push this to master before the release?

Given that 
 * you're the relevant machine maintainer
 * it's a one-liner
 * and it's a clear bugfix, 
sure, go ahead. 

Cheers & thanks, Andreas

> 
> Bye,
> Stefan
> 


-- 
PD Dr. Andreas K. Hüttel
[email protected]
Gentoo Linux developer 
(council, comrel, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 870 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=CVnk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.