Re: [PATCH v3] elf: Release dl_load_lock before running dlopen constructors (BZ 15686)

Carlos O'Donell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha
Organization Red Hat, LLC.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/21/26 8:18 AM, Mikhail Novosyolov wrote:
> For us (Artem and me), as a distro, it is not a problem to carry a
> backport in an older version, where we need it.

I want to highlight that the work you are doing here as a distro is
very valuable to upstream. You are providing us with feedback on how
a production deployment of the solution is working. I appreciate that
feedback.

Getting that working solution back to upstream is also important
because it allows us all to work on the same solutions going forward.
  
> It is up to you to decide if this has to be backported to
> release/2.4x/master or not. I think here, due to potential
> regressions, better avoid a backport.

Yes, correct. We can also backport with the tunable default flipped
to the conservative position so we are testing the code more broadly?

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.