Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/5] riscv: Optimize fmaximum_num and fminimum_num

Peter Bergner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On 8/6/26 1:34 PM, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote:
> The version 2.2 of the F extension requirement really makes this messy to keep
> deployment generic. Ideally it would be better to implement it with builtin and
> let compiler handle it, and then we gate it through USE_*_BUILTIN. If deployers
> want to support pre 2.1 hardware, using the generic implementation is the price
> to pay.

I agree with you and Jeff, a builtin solution is preferable to me too.

Peter
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.