Re: Potential glibc 2.43 regression on big-endian targets
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.ports.sparc,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.linux.debian.ports.powerpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2ca41652090882c0db9b98bb660440c112c910ff.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> |
On Sun, 2026-08-23 at 07:35 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2026-08-23 at 06:51 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On Sat, 2026-08-22 at 16:23 -0300, Adhemerval Zanella Netto wrote: > > > I run tests on powerpc64/powerpc32 from time to time on cfarm121 and I haven't > > > see any other than the usual regressions [1][2]. Did it started with 2.43? > > > > Yes, I'm quite confident that it started with 2.43. > > I just noticed the following message on the kernel buffer, it might be related: > > [ 1814.130181] cgroup: fork rejected by pids controller in /system.slice/cron.service So, I assume the issues on PowerPC and SPARC are unrelated. The latter seems to have been a configuration issue only while the former could definitely be a bug. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913