Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform

"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:18:49 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs,gmane.linux.man,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha
Message-ID <20260801201849.hzg6ufqxmwi2efzz@illithid>
--cwsoivffveyepjnz
Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform
MIME-Version: 1.0

Hi Sam & Alex,

Just a quick note on conflicts on interest since I'm the one who dragged
that label into the conversation--though the concept was implicitly
present already.

At 2026-08-01T15:38:42+0100, Sam James wrote:
> Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> writes:
> > FWIW, regarding the possible conflict of interest that was mentioned
> > yesterday, I'll say that I don't get paid for my contributions to
> > ISO C as a member of WG14.  There's no benefit to me other than
> > public recognition.  I'll also disclose the exact quantity that I've
> > been paid for maintaining the Linux man-pages project:
>=20
> You can have a conflict of interest in responsibliity without money
> being involved. In fact, I have never believed you were influenced by
> money,

Sam makes a good point, and Alex, I think you overlooked one.

Disclosure of the quantity of your compensation as Linux man-pages
maintainer is of less importance than _who_ sponsored your work.

When we're speaking of currency, yes, quantity eventually has a quality
all its own.  But knowing who's been signing the checks is almost always
the more valuable information because it tells us who is in a position
to expect favorable treatment.  Sometimes that's because the parties
negotiate a quid pro quo, but more often sponsors can count on
"self-regulation" by their beneficiaries.  Money men understand that
people's minds and uncritical loyalties can often be bought cheaply.

Free your mind and something else will follow, I think someone said.

Here's a backgrounder that's less antiseptic than a corporate ethics
slide deck training module on conflicts of interest.

https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-money-complaints-sparked=
-resignation-fears-scotus

Regards,
Branden

--cwsoivffveyepjnz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=K7I7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cwsoivffveyepjnz--