Re: the Linux man-pages as an educational tool

Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 01:41:35 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs,gmane.linux.man,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha
Message-ID <am_VUE1SzxqRkTAo@devuan>
--z7hszugfj5ikgglz
Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]>
To: Collin Funk <[email protected]>
Cc: "G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]>, 
	Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= <[email protected]>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>, 
	Paul Eggert <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], 
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: the Linux man-pages as an educational tool
Message-ID: <am_VUE1SzxqRkTAo@devuan>
References: <20260802000833.zpu27l7ibvrbouna@illithid>
 <am6PkypxYg-Fq4Iz@devuan>
 <[email protected]>
 <am6X32HkGdm2xTd7@devuan>
 <[email protected]>
 <am-2d02e1qq78Asv@devuan>
 <[email protected]>
 <20260802231058.o7gud4bd7co2nbhv@illithid>
 <[email protected]>
 <am_TTjDLlAI68zkp@devuan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <am_TTjDLlAI68zkp@devuan>

> Date: 2026-08-03 01:37:30+0200
> From: Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]>
>
> Hi Collin,
>=20
> > Date: 2026-08-02 16:27:21-0700
> > From: Collin Funk <[email protected]>
> >
> [...]
> >=20
> > I can't help but wonder of what happens in WG 14 rejects this
> > controversial, as obvious by this thread, change. Will the man-pages
> > changes be reverted?

> > Or will we slowly watch them document personal
> > preferences instead of existing standards?

BTW, as I showed in another subthread, strncpy(3) did contain
opinionated comments well before I was involved.  If you're really
going to accuse me of that, better make sure you get the history right.


Cheers,
Alex

>=20
> This patch set is quite independent of the standard.  It documents a
> header file that has been provided since forever in glibc and most other
> POSIX-ish systems, so changes to the standard are unlikely to have any
> effects.  I've clarified this extensively.  If you want to discourage me
> from applying the change, you should rather bring up technical reasons.
>=20
> This passive-aggressive message is not something that will have the
> desired effects you could possibly reach with technical arguments.
>=20
>=20
> Have a lovely night, please!
> Alex
>=20
> > After seeing weekly threads
> > about the prototype changes, I don't think it is an unreasonable
> > concern.
> >=20
> > Collin
> >=20
>=20
> --=20
> <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>



--=20
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>

--z7hszugfj5ikgglz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=SfnM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--z7hszugfj5ikgglz--