Re: incorrect use of 'pure' attribute

On 8/7/26 19:36, Sam James wrote:
> __eloop_threshold isn't const and a comment
> acknowledges this.

Actually, the comment says that __eloop_threshold is validly marked 
'const' even though it uses memory and calls a function, because its 
return value is unaffected by the memory use and the function call.

If the comment is incorrect it'd be interesting to know why.