Re: [RFC] should physmem be cgroup-aware?

On 20/08/2026 12:43, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I do note that sort(1) uses both nproc() and physmem_total(),
> which suggests a shared or cached interface may be useful, but that
> can come at a later stage.
In retrospect, given Linux presents this info in separate files
(cpu,max and memory.max} at each level, the consolidation
would have to be done in the kernel, and there is little
that could be optimized in gnulib about that.

cheers,
Padraig