Re: Website Redesign Concept
Patrick Cardona <[email protected]> Mon, 01 Dec 2025 15:35:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.gnustep.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6329741b6252605453b88d41f41b790d@pi400> |
Hello Luke, On 2025-11-28 22:11:13 +0100 Luke Lollard <[email protected]> wrote: > Howdy, > > Hopefully my fellow Americans aren't too sleepy from feasting on > turkey. > > There was a thread regarding GNUstep PR earlier this year, which > spawned > another conversation. In one of those, Greg requested that Steven and > I > work on a concept for a website redesign. > This is now online with GitHub Pages: > https://haihige.github.io/gnustepwebsite/ > > Please note that this rough draft is more about the structure and > content of the website than the look. > > The source is on GitHub, and the site can still be viewed while > navigating the directories on GitHub: > https://github.com/haihige/gnustepwebsite > > The overall concern of this (to steal a line from Steven): > Everything you need; nothing you don't. > > - Home page: clearly, quickly describe what GNUstep is, and direct > readers to the other pages for more details. > - About: the least developed section, but this would contain general > information about GNUstep's features, architecture, history, etc. > - Gallery: showcase solid examples of software created with GNUstep. > - Blog: a place for news and developer posts. > - Community: how to contribute and help out. > - Docs: guides, educational resources, documentation, etc. > > I think the Docs section is the most important, and eventually the > largest, part of the website. > > What happened to the original plan? > The thought was to update the wiki first. Riccardo was very helpful, > answered many questions that I had, and was instrumental in getting me > access. However, after reviewing the wiki with Steven and discussing > with Greg, we came to the conclusion that it wasn't worth it for now. > The wiki was slow and unstable (often not loading at all), making it > difficult to work with. There was lots of broken and unorganized > information; essentially with no clear structure. There's definitely > some good information on the wiki (so we shouldn't delete it), but it > doesn't seem like many are interested in maintaining it. > > One of the current issues with the website and wiki is that many links > are external and now broken. Instead, I propose we bring as much > information as possible directly into the GNUstep website (see > `/docs/developer/articles` and `/blog/articles`). The focus is on > providing and preserving educational resources for Objective-C and > Cocoa. > > Why move to internal resources? > - A user can pull down the whole repo and have these resources > offline. > - We can own them, continue to improve them, and ensure that they stay > with us; instead of becoming a burden of dead links. > - archive.org leaves a not-so-great impression on visitors: it's often > slow to load and if the information isn't still live on the > Internet, > some may think that it isn't valuable any more. But, for some things > it may still be necessary. > > There are a ton of great resources from the peak of the Objective-C > Cocoa era (2000-2015). Many of these have been archived on archive.org > or GitHub. The page you chose for developer.apple.com on WayBack is not responding. Tested with Chromium. > > If you think this is heading in the right direction, pull requests are > welcome. :) > Regards, Patrick -- Patrick Cardona - Pi400 - GNU/Linux aarch64 (Debian 13.2) Xorg (1:7.7+24) - libcairo2 (1.18.4-1+rpt1 arm64) Window Maker (0.96.0-4) - GWorkspace (1.1.0 - 02 2025) - Theme: AGNOSTEP - MUA: GNUMail (1.4.0)