Re: Who's looking after GNUstepWeb?
Sebastian Reitenbach <[email protected]> Wed, 20 May 2026 23:43:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.gnustep.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEoLn6_B_ByDrx9PzboM1bdYKwKyLdYKVs2HHOQMfjPCaDucwg@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000e1806c065246b132 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, WRT SOPE/SOGo you're probably too late, to help them out. They're planning to drop Objective-C backend completely, and rewrite in Python. https://www.sogo.nu/news/2026/sogo-v6-february.html https://www.sogo.nu/news/2025/fosdem-and-future-of-sogo.html cheers, Sebastian On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 7:02=E2=80=AFPM David Wetzel via Discussion list fo= r the GNUstep programming environment <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On May 20, 2026, at 12:46, Ethan C <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What's the status of SOPE (SOGo's WebObjects clone)? > > No idea. They were not aiming to do the same as WO. They were strictly > single thread and with modern CPUs that does not make sense IMHO. > > > Should we try to work together with them, or have a fork of SOPE instea= d > of continuing GNUstepWeb development, or incorporate some code from SOPE > into GNUstepWeb? > > We have some areas that need improvement like: > > * the apache adapter should keep the connection open > * we should do proper load balancing depending on the sessions / load > * we need a WOMonitor App that allows you to start / stop instances. > > With modern AI tools those things should be pretty easy to add. The Apach= e > adapter is currently very basic. > > David > > > --=20 https://buzzdeee.reitenba.ch --000000000000e1806c065246b132 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>WRT SOPE/SOGo you're= probably too late, to help them out.=C2=A0</div><div>They're planning = to drop Objective-C backend completely, and rewrite in Python.</div><div><b= r></div><div><a href=3D"https://www.sogo.nu/news/2026/sogo-v6-february.html= ">https://www.sogo.nu/news/2026/sogo-v6-february.html</a></div><div><a href= =3D"https://www.sogo.nu/news/2025/fosdem-and-future-of-sogo.html">https://w= ww.sogo.nu/news/2025/fosdem-and-future-of-sogo.html</a><br><br></div><div>c= heers,</div><div>Sebastian</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_q= uote_container"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, May 20, 2026 = at 7:02=E2=80=AFPM David Wetzel via Discussion list for the GNUstep program= ming environment <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">discuss-gnu= [email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl= e=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddin= g-left:1ex"><br> <br> > On May 20, 2026, at 12:46, Ethan C <<a href=3D"mailto:echaroenpitak= [email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> > <br> > What's the status of SOPE (SOGo's WebObjects clone)?<br> <br> No idea. They were not aiming to do the same as WO. They were strictly sing= le thread and with modern CPUs that does not make sense IMHO.<br> <br> > Should we try to work together with them, or have a fork of SOPE inste= ad of continuing GNUstepWeb development, or incorporate some code from SOPE= into GNUstepWeb?<br> <br> We have some areas that need improvement like:<br> <br> * the apache adapter should keep the connection open<br> * we should do proper load balancing depending on the sessions / load<br> * we need a WOMonitor App that allows you to start / stop instances.<br> <br> With modern AI tools those things should be pretty easy to add. The Apache = adapter is currently very basic.<br> <br> David<br> <br> <br> </blockquote></div><div><br clear=3D"all"></div><br><span class=3D"gmail_si= gnature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><d= iv dir=3D"ltr"><a href=3D"https://buzzdeee.reitenba.ch" target=3D"_blank">h= ttps://buzzdeee.reitenba.ch</a></div></div> --000000000000e1806c065246b132--