Re: Distributing gnustep-based software
Sébastien Pierre <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.gnustep.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 4 févr. 05, à 19:46, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit : >> Ok, that's fair. I think I will dig the use of libFoundation and >> mgStep. > > They aren't significantly smaller ... except where they lack > functionality. > You can configure gnustep to omit similar functionality and shrink it > to > about the same footprint. Depends what functionality you need. I would prefer to stick with GNUstep, because it's maintained and up-to-date. However, I only need a small subset of the Foundation (NSString, NSArray, NSDictionnary, NSTask, NSInvocation, NSObject, NSProxy are the class I use most). Anyway, I will try to make my own version of the gnustep-base, and see how to trim it to get a "fat-free" version of it, regarding to my modest applicative needs. Thanks again for such a quality feedback :) -- Sébastien -- «Too old to be alternative, too alternative to be old.» <http://www.type-z.org> | Robert Smith, talking about his epitaph.