Re: NSXMLDocument

> I stopped doing anything with it when it became apparent to me from  
> the desgin of the API, that Apples new classes are actually a  
> wrapper round libxml2 ... and we already have a wrapper round  
> libxml2 in GSXML.m in the base library.  So I couldn't decide what  
> to do:
> We could implement a second wrapper around libxml2 following Apple's  
> API and implementation details as closely as we can,

I (personally) vote for this option.  Maybe we could even remove GSXML  
at some point. ;-)

Eg, Renaissance has separate XML parsing code for GNUstep and Apple.   
It would be nice to have been able to use a single API
across the two. :-)

Getting rid of libxml2 and going for the pure Objective-C route sounds  
like a big job ... for little gain, so I don't think it would
be very useful.

Thanks