Re: Media WIKI
MJ Ray <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.gnustep.webmasters |
|---|---|
| Organization | Very poor |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2004-12-16 19:15:00 +0000 Alex Perez <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, you might if it were functional. And please, this "FooWiki > isn't a wiki > because it's impure" stuff sounds alarmingly like what religious > zealots say > about religions besides their own [...] I am objective. I have no idea why you rabbit about "There is no True Wiki" - are you ignorant of how wiki started? The first one, WikiWikiWeb, is still online if you want to refer to it. I say MediaWiki is not a wiki because it doesn't share enough of the WikiDesignPrinciples or reasons WhyWikiWorks (see http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WhyDesignPrinciples and similar). It's OK if you disagree with my conclusion. My comment is nothing like zealotry and it's dumb to try picking a fight with my religious beliefs. If the software changes, I may be not be technically hindered in using the wiki, but if it's MediaWiki, wouldn't it be easier for me to edit the main site? $DEITY knows, I've had little enough time to do that lately. So, I'd best end this email and free some time now. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ Unsolicited attachments to the pipex address deleted Will HLF fund tree-killings? http://www.thewalks.co.uk/