Re: StringPrep in ICU4JNI?

В Птн, 11/02/2005 в 17:25 -0800, Ram Viswanadha пишет:
> >>The reason there is no StringPrep in ICU4JNI is that ICU4J already has 
> >>pure JAVA implementation.
> > 
> > 
> > Isn't that considerably slower than the ICU4JNI equivalent, as stated on
> > the site? I'm particularly interested in normalization performance.
> The statement was true when Noramalization was re-implemented in ICU4C
> and accessed through ICU4JNI and ICU4J still had the old implementation. 
>    Normalization has be reimplemented in ICU4J since then and the new 
> implementation makes use of the same tricks and techniques that gave 
> ICU4C's implementation a performance boost. I have not tested the 
> performance but am sure that this statement is not accurate.

OK, I think I'll go with ICU4J proper then. Thank you.