RE: int64 support - additional API proposed

Pete Barber <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:14:00 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.icu.general
Message-ID <898D73F2C81ACD4FBE0EE8F900CA3C5403D06B32@rdgxch05.enterprise.veritas.com>
>>There is still debate about supporting unsigned as well as signed
>>support.  I agree that support for uint64 would be useful, but tend to
>>side with George that we should probably wait another release when
>>issues with stdio and uint64 on our supported platforms are
>>cleared up.  Please speak up now, though, if you differ!
Just providing support for int64 is bit like building a donkey with 3 legs.
It'll still work but won't be able to do everything you want.  Hence, you
will have to adapt the environment around it.  In some cases this will mean
wrapping ICU in order to perform this functionality or not using it at all.

I'd like a 4 legged donkey right from the start!

Pete