Re: Unicode implementation concept

Markus Scherer <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:39:29 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.icu.general
Organization IBM
Message-ID <[email protected]>
About which UTF to use:
http://www.mindspring.com/~markus.scherer/unicode/tn-uni16-20040113.html
(Fresh paint here. This may get modified. It may moved to http://www.unicode.org/notes/)

About wchar_t:
http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/docs/papers/unicode_wchar_t.html

The idea of carrying offset tables or tables of character lengths is doable, but inefficient. Best 
to use the same UTF everywhere. Best to use UTF-16 for processing.

markus

-- 
Opinions expressed here may not reflect my company's positions unless otherwise noted.