Re: Unicode implementation concept

Tex Texin wrote:
> looks good. might be worth mentioning the difference in binary sort ordering
> when you switch between utf-16 and utf-8.

Good point, another one in line with the consistency argument like having to translate indexes when 
using different UTFs. I think I will see what other feedback I get and keep this for a 2nd revision.

> If the document encourages a migration to utf-16, it would be good for people
> to know...

Yes.

I also had additional audiences in mind:
- people migrating from legacy codepage processing to Unicode
- people confused by claims that "Linux uses UTF-8"
   (there is a lot of UTF-16 too)

markus

-- 
Opinions expressed here may not reflect my company's positions unless otherwise noted.