Re: Ntpdate and sntpclock differ by 20+ seconds
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> Tue, 04 Feb 2003 01:25:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.libtai |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bennett Todd <[email protected]> writes: > If you want to run your system in POSIX's perverted "UTC jerked > around to create the illusion that leapseconds don't exist", > but still want to use the clockspeed package, just delete > /etc/leapsecs.dat. And think about maybe stopping clockspeed, > hand-syncing the clock, and restarting clockspeed around leapseconds > to avoid having the required clock skip confuse clockspeed's > stabilization. If that matters, you better make sure to regulate the clock oscillator's temperature... has the next leap second be announced at all? I gather the announcements for leap seconds go out half a year in advance. -- Matthias Andree