Re: RFC: Makefile refactoring

Arthur Smith wrote:

>
> Fewer library files (or just one) would be a little nicer - I've 
> certainly had occasions where I accidentally left off one of the 
> libraries and then was wondering what went wrong. No strong feelings 
> on this though.
>
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
>> I'd like to get a feel for what others think about this idea.  If 
>> there's interest then I can submit the patch -- probably after the 
>> currently-pending code is released, so that I can resync against the 
>> released version.
>
Yea !   This sort of work can proceed in two directions.  It sounds like 
you have nailed down the first. 

The second would be providing some aid in using just a part of the 
library function and only pulling in the required parts . . .

more,
l8r,
v


-- 
"The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."
 -- William Gibson, quoted by Whitfield Diffie