Re: max length of randomLen for C_GenerateRandom
Florent <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Apr 2017 17:15:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.muscle |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANQLNWtLx89b3qbK_q5z7tSgKm9TzERWq5LoU_ZeMw2r1XBOkQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks for your answer Ludovic. > I suggest you to use a hardware dedicated to random number generation. > Yes, this is of course the main option I have in mind. My question remains theoretical in the event we don't trust any of the TRNG vendors ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_hardware_random_number_generators ). I may have more confidence in a certified card, like the JCOP 2.4.1r3 which has been evaluated according to the AIS 31 of the BSI. > A smart card may be too slow for you. > Yes, I am aware of that. But certified TRNG are also very slow (75 kbps for the Quantis AIS31 for example). Let's just say that the time is not a issue for me :) > Also I am not sure that the data returned by C_GenerateRandom() always > comes from the smart card. It depends on the PKCS#11 library you use. > Yes, you're right. Thanks for the warning. In order to be sure I would need the source code of the PKCS#11 library, right? So by the content of your answer, I presume this hasn't been tested/considered yet? (assuming the data comes genuinely from the internal generator of the card). Cheers _______________________________________________ Pcsclite-muscle mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pcsclite-muscle