Re: using polkit
Martin Paljak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.muscle |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACsm3DU6FSpokEc0XHmV4eCO55D0qMakwTL=wZrMJFWkNXasNQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hello, On 21 December 2013 12:00, Ludovic Rousseau <[email protected]> wrote: > - maybe you should use "org.debian.alioth.pcsc-lite.foobar" instead of > "org.debian.pcsc-lite.foobar" (with alioth added) Something I've seen a lot with Java code: package names need to be unique. One way to accomplish this is to use the inverse of your domain name (which you "control" thus where you can avoid collisions in a "free world"). But that's not a requirement, only a "good practice if you can't think of anything else". The only requirement (to avoid problems) is to not have collisions in package names. If you think that there will be more "Debians" where will be "more pcsc-lites", you could need more bits. But I'm sure there will not be another pcsc-lite, even if there would, it would have a different name. Thus "org.debian.pcsc-lite" is both memorable and also enough to avoid collisions. So my suggestion is to keep it "readable" and "possible to type for humans". org.sourceforge.projects.bla.users.x.Something. is a ReallyBadPackageName (or similar). Note to self and others: don't use DokuWiki as the namespace feature can make one go taxonomy-crazy. -- Martin +372 515 6495