Re: pkcs11 and MuscleCard
wully <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.muscle |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Remark: when directely using MSC-Functions, the RSA-public-key-blob returned, is correctely including the modulus and the public exponent, (which is 2^16+1). wully On 15.03.2014 15:07, wully wrote: > Hi > > I have further investigated the musclecard. Now, I can use pkcs11 for > creating objects, loading RSA-keys, > encrypting and decrypting (with RSA_NO_PAD). I am very pleased, that > this is starting to work... > > But I have noticed something strange: > > when loading an RSA-keypair from the host to the empty musclecard, > there are created THREE > key-objects. I would expect TWO. > > ----------- snippet from the modified muscletest output ---- > Verify default PIN : Successful > Currently logged identities : 0002 > CreateObject returns : Successful > WriteObject returns : Successful > ReadObject returns : Successful > Object data : MUSCLE VIRTUAL CARD. > Data comparison : Successful > > Listing objects : Successful > ------------------------------------------------------ > Object ID Object Size READ WRITE DELETE > ----------------- ----------- ---- ----- ------ > c1 50 0000 0000 0000 > k2 512 0000 0002 0002 > k1 912 0002 0002 0002 > k0 512 0000 0002 0002 > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Free object memory : 00003948 > DeleteObject returns : Successful > Free object memory : 00004014 > GetChallenge returns : Successful > Random data : 21 EE 14 0B D4 7A 21 19 > ----------- end snippet ---------- > > > Object c1 is created (and afterwards deleted) by muscletest. That is ok. > as one can see, the object with ID k2 is created in addition to the > two k0(public) and k1(private). > From the pkcs11-trace, I see, that k2 contains the same public key as k0. > But when asking the CKA_PUBLIC_EXPONENT from k0, I get > CKR_ATTRIBUTE_TYPE_INVALID. > The CKA_MODULUS is ok. > > In the pkcs11-trace, the key k2 contains such an attribute, but in k0, > the attribute is removed. > Why? No idea. > > I will try, to access k2 (which I did not create) and see, wether the > CKA_PUBLIC_EXPONENT will be given. > > wully > > > >