Re: [PATCH] ctype: Fix bitfield types on 16-bit targets
Hans-Bernhard Bröker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 20.07.2018 um 21:11 schrieb Sebastian Huber: > ----- Am 20. Jul 2018 um 19:37 schrieb Hans-Bernhard Bröker [email protected]: >> I.e. compilers are not required to allow uint32_least_t in this place. > The previous code used short for a bit-field, so this patch makes nothing worse in this respect That's not quite as certain as you make it sound. Whether a compiler allows "short" for bitfields is entirely unrelated to it allowing "uint32_least_t" for them. All four combinations of outcomes are possible (though not equally probable). > Do you know a C99+ compiler which has a problem with such a bit-field? No. But neither do I claim my knowledge of C compilers to be complete.