Re: RISC-V: GCC crti.S vs. Newlib __libc_init_array()

Joel Sherrill <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.newlib
Message-ID <CAF9ehCXSN-2UfXqF+NghZsWK1MR8T4L0kcAGoqHpJb0jatszRQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Sebastian Huber <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> the GCC provided libgcc/config/riscv/crti.S and libgcc/config/riscv/crtn.S
> files are empty on RISC-V, e.g. they contain no definitions of _init and
> _fini. This leads to undefined references in Newlib provided
> __libc_init_array() and __libc_fini_array(). I would like to fix this.
> Should this be done via some configure test or a __riscv machine define in
> newlib/libc/misc/init.c and newlib/libc/misc/fini.c?


I would lean to a __riscv define in newlib/libc/misc/init.c and fini.c.

But if they need these, why aren't they in gcc? This seems to be covering
up a gcc issue that would impact non-RTEMS targets.


>
>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Dornierstr.+4,+D-82178+Puchheim,+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : [email protected]
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.