Re: [PATCH] libstdc++-v3: Have aligned_alloc() on Newlib

On 13/08/18 19:57, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 13/08/18 13:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 13/08/18 12:55 +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>>> On 09/08/18 10:08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>> Yes please, on trunk and 7 and 8. It's better to use the standard
>>>> aligned_alloc if available.
>>>>
>>>
>>> but the newlib aligned_alloc is broken on baremetal targets,
>>> it is implemented using posix_memalign which is not provided
>>> by the newlib malloc implementation (except on cygwin)
>>
>> Ouch, OK, let's revert it. Using memalign is fine.
>>
>> The original problem that I think Sebastian was trying to solve should
>> be fixed by r263409 anyway (and was backported to all branches).
> 
> I've committed this to trunk and will do so on the branches too.
> 

thanks, this fixed the issue for me on trunk.