Re: [PATCH 1/4] Use nanf("") instead of nanf(NULL)
Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 27 11:32, [email protected] wrote: > From: Keith Packard <[email protected]> > > Newer GCC versions require a non-NULL argument to this function for > some reason. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <[email protected]> > --- > newlib/libc/stdio/nano-vfscanf_float.c | 2 +- > newlib/libc/stdio/vfscanf.c | 2 +- > newlib/libc/stdio/vfwscanf.c | 2 +- > newlib/libc/stdlib/strtod.c | 4 ++-- > newlib/libc/stdlib/wcstod.c | 6 +++--- > 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Pushed. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAluGpzcACgkQ9TYGna5E T6DztA/+M2AZSFyd/01f6RJlLj8bDGj++Pi9M63JLr3PIQfV0V4qguqXZaal0tM5 uLtcReNRQUAj8cfmbV2ziVB5apiJZHzcn+l9WZSgb+8QglGcPz1B7otKDS60x2kV e0YeTg4XN5CifrTxq/75K0PR23o27TapmHDamqWbktx8PNpuNqJ8DP8wurw3mwP4 F/OQw/EcWRClKVlm+NRu6gJVYEVwsp6p+BhHV8wViBhX0m8RnlgCGjo1NQM5zCWS krB+2J7dH2R9mUlrPnIiiUNJp2hCyDWJv4HdEsXmwYjqesFqEn1OLxtz5igz9/P9 QNZOSS+STniNXJFORRCMuf3DvaPcClCFgfAw6rhSVbVFT6xERWtVm1IQTqnRczod sPsXC1yvRMhFufIt5E8yDfdkaxF2CFKkYLX0WV01wKlgJazgLQnUjOWLDxu92dbN NLgRV/0mdmJkN1MM+h/mQJCRdTqpNp7tc1MlSUwWGO1QELBYMVKJej1n85v9TSnP cpCSv1DNNBvKHRF2M/N54A9buqv8lxbOGjijp7IdXI7Noooa8sEHDU5v21jKOXUw u8kILBdP9s104N9ZWGLKnSWUvQtd7/IqkljFdRLkuRmzFNpTksa2b+/Iw0IniTRI xvB1XTD6VUDs/+cMoKNvWYygg03uQ5RlfwSgVZQBDs4glPMB1Ao= =hm62 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----