Re: [PATCH 2/3] Move register_t to system-specific header
Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 13 20:01, Sebastian Huber wrote: > ----- Am 13. Feb 2019 um 18:06 schrieb Corinna Vinschen [email protected]: > > > On Feb 13 14:19, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Huber <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> newlib/libc/include/machine/types.h | 2 ++ > >> newlib/libc/include/sys/types.h | 2 +- > >> newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/machine/types.h | 2 ++ > >> winsup/cygwin/include/machine/types.h | 2 ++ > >> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/newlib/libc/include/machine/types.h > >> b/newlib/libc/include/machine/types.h > >> index 19d0e8560..fab9cf72c 100644 > >> --- a/newlib/libc/include/machine/types.h > >> +++ b/newlib/libc/include/machine/types.h > >> @@ -11,3 +11,5 @@ typedef __uint64_t u_quad_t; > >> typedef __int64_t quad_t; > >> typedef quad_t * qaddr_t; > >> #endif > >> + > >> +typedef int register_t; > >> diff --git a/newlib/libc/include/sys/types.h b/newlib/libc/include/sys/types.h > >> index 2685df654..e05263d4e 100644 > >> --- a/newlib/libc/include/sys/types.h > >> +++ b/newlib/libc/include/sys/types.h > >> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ typedef __uint32_t u_int32_t; > >> #if ___int64_t_defined > >> typedef __uint64_t u_int64_t; > >> #endif > >> -typedef int register_t; > >> + > >> #define __BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__ 1 > > > > Why move this out here? Sure, it's wrong for 64 bit targets ATM, > > but moving it to rtems and Cygwin only means that the type suddenly > > disappears for other targets. Better just fix it here for all targets, > > including defining uregister_t if __BSD_VISIBLE. > > I found three <machine/types.h> in Newlib, one for Cygwin, one for > RTEMS and one for the rest. I moved the definition of register_t to > the <machine/types.h> which is included by <sys/types.h> at the end. Oh, right, I missed the non-rtems, non-Cygwin case. > If I change the type to __intptr_t wounldn't this break ABI > compatibility on Cygwin? In how far? Cygwin's 64 bit ABI is LP64. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAlxkfgcACgkQ9TYGna5E T6CQBxAAn4w7v/pE2itKgzGndJ3Gz3wRUy5c9RLrf2tNo3j0AByNVYPeWwGKLsGY RFW7lAU1tLE3zVLZrJiJZU6HT1nJmo/P4+FGvG5qQLy3JOe8vzLvc18gJiVgoz6g yOzircnICRLV0tQdZeAOU/hfoky0uf1IMFR7E1bv/w1GfXUky5XaoPCVw9ydyMbb eXvlBBHWGeoH5vinKT3KcxpSpq95kmKh5A0+bIvfrXSf8zR3hljLKYm875/MS+UW kUJDBaV6apTUsDzgmwRDitAgVA6n6l3QuuPlC3r4O2BPPfUVjbFbdwIffhZyymQK cE8zqHkAdP44xuZseClALWk3pIW128Xjhs5GEv39lUuLqBZSR9OfsgEEjkUcA83t 56a6hBKcahKIH6M7GfzAqPZIcoiXMI4J4r6Pykrn8YR3y6pF8YQK4osOB7ASu7UI PwcSVhX1LHuT/QLADa8IAQMqcgbCkd9iYWBKxTMicy+2BNZZLpVU3chPYWkLnQO1 cb1rWPnjCD1/7iPFxK5q58NE5drHW91hlomjhzQ7+aMwtAIiynm7ceBCruhJ3/F0 yHVHoGzb1btV+gdv/0a2JU9ROlD8YF9CRvPCITuMerpT7lJ44Mww+bpFzxSnZC48 gUMe815sYOAbM/pC3at5hLm6tz7tCiEVcawdc/KAq+12bzo+RYM= =CJyR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----