Re: Avoid implicit declarations in long double complex functions
Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Dionna, On Jun 12 17:14, Dionna Amalie Glaze via newlib wrote: > Hi y'all, I came across some compilation errors that the following patch > fixed. Most long double complex math functions use long double real > functions that are only defined #ifdef _LDBL_EQ_DBL, so I extended that to > the functions that use them. Your patch doesn't apply, Pretty much all hunks have fuzz, and git am returns with "error: corrupt patch at line 241" Can you check, please? If that's a MUA isssue, you could attach the patch as plain text. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAl0CLfMACgkQ9TYGna5E T6B9/g//R3sBKVNyCFBlsBj/6M874s7BjPdZOcBRtMa6Wp1gAyW6HwtBXvxazVxT 8TkSa2gxzq0d+Chu+lFo+rtLa8E+bpUveePNU7BKHr6FurGgCM5VARZwhkAJmXue N5MyWq8Iq8C2UMYx7RbL8Xpc0hs0QXIfBx8f+w8uzp5GmPvNWFAX7/nm9+02YycL 42nGnfawiP9aUr/m14SGDsPBcBZRksasUF5AX3XKx0oQGdCSSm7SyB/go/1cnYRB 3k/AOgfa2Wm/Z3QnxBbTQTg+C2qsbyTuKm/cCmtkfSSj+sjeVQDF+77qzdv6fkQ1 pnG03oCX/ZVRRQzFPLcA8+yHK3Dr4US2c1mwYeLHPfl644GddydoJ2kUo9hUxuKA N++uZqflvaUAF/vZn3BtIyQ30fnWduXW5JkpnWFdlwUMHbnPKhARCybZEVyq5QsP /wuHLU6jOqt7eUI8UaIJloOkvEdphlXLPSlV6plhW5Hvq0Ijwr8xKPo5ktob1Z1n eFlQi+jdDJMBeMSMc4sw6hXGXobyQKFxULxrkj1CSgObzQT45mTRPeakvpFYymVA NvsyR9K0R8ttGoAaP/YFxOiF38rpXWZrZQk8QIOGq5CAS7KYmU60xWfO5DJsIXXd Xqh6ixDWPiKUilVjBfp78hPA+xlLcghxyOar7zcAeNMEVAbMqGs= =faBV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----