Re: Cygwin: Implement sched_[gs]etaffinity() commit breaks RTEMS port
Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 28 10:06, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Fri, 2019-06-28 at 03:17 -0700, Mark Geisert wrote: > > We can call it a day, with review and release of the current patch state. > > If you think it's worthwhile to implement CPU_SET on Cygwin now, rather > > than later, I can look into it but it's not strictly necessary at this > > time. > > We shouldn't be do things half-way. taskset may not require it, but > any use of CPU sets could very well expect this to be present: > > http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/CPU_SET.3.html Agreed. We shouldn't release 3.1 without it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAl0WIPIACgkQ9TYGna5E T6CQjg//S15mKcbibRFwR+D4QahapSE18LcluGW+KXVFvIHhdBo6IHRsbVq/R3Sd qym0qLINlOzhln8psVYjYLnXNl6xzaefhhddYfiWVUlJFXn2e0Z1od86JKsGAr7H C6tdc5B58wvjGVVBOfFLiX06lVcM5LXfzhcv2kKKV/syakd1gxggH0tPixHRLFPw vgy7RsMDcbB18/dXUGjxKnyqq8ld26UBNciJwlTd5YjEqU8NXbJwrQRzUAGBR+EG fMerMUaaPq10yIwNID6vJ7RTl/9Gw6GtptrGD6mioIdpkJLMuyHtamS3rVi4YVSc i1vtFe02uPip22SRZ0DbG3/x44Qz2k85r5KeCOG5ObVDS708of93z5qIEjbuGebb DJ8bHR364c7Pw+jp8kBCluVOrdgHadm8OFTb1meHFScJ2uFVeOHlSVjowWp0gktl xMatKgYCZJG3Cgr5Ulu30vJPRAw67JLfbywLdltOWJCnSnuo7SRgGkfPHQe5bDnd ISzyhu8Ha4xrY8DJK8+VELRtn/F0EBxXTYNSzpJL0/UGCUfAM/zwHtcT+xrK/6za xJGiwSYFM0cy6hzTZJMFjZln85zqJLpfjfLpZE+4KaU+N/aBuOpSssCG40rN3bgq ONlJiKocEZ6inPuLFjHEGtKUhaTbLIE6JY5bVuNi+iTJ8tRi+sE= =ujVA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----