Re: [PATCH v1] Port ndbm
Joel Sherrill <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF9ehCXVECRZ8MGUVtbRjmeW9VM=7NvZvv4LMV+Qs0rMuc-8rA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 12:59 PM Yaakov Selkowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 12:44 -0400, Craig Howland via newlib wrote: > > This is POSIX XSI. Shouldn't there be some kind of gate? (Or since the > entire > > header is under XSI, no gate is needed since the user controls it on a > file > > level? I prefer this, but I don't know what general Newlib policy is, > as most > > are mixed in and need individual gates.) > > The latter. > Just to be clear, you are wanting gates around individual (or small groups of) methods? What about committing this with as few possible changes as possible to the original FreeBSD code and then doing this? --joel > > -- > Yaakov Selkowitz > Senior Software Engineer - Platform Enablement > Red Hat, Inc. > > >