Re: [PATCH v2] Add i386 and x86_64 fenv support from Cygwin.
Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 4 12:14, Eric Blake wrote: > On 9/4/19 11:58 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > >>>>> +++ b/newlib/libc/machine/x86_64/sys/fenv.h > >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ > >>>>> +/* > >>>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause > >>>>> + * > >>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2010-2019 Red Hat, Inc. > >>>>> + * All rights reserved. > >>>>> + * > >>>>> + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > >>>>> + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions > >>>>> + * are met: > >>>>> + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > >>>>> + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > >>>>> + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright > >>>>> + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the > >>>>> + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. > >>>>> + * > >>>>> + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND > >>>>> + * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE > >>>>> + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE > >>>>> + * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE > >>>>> + * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL > >>>>> + * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS > >>>>> + * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) > >>>>> + * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT > > >> I didn't actually check newlib files, but SPDX + written out license > >> only makes marginal sense. So, let's start with *these* files to do it > >> right, please. > > > > SPDX line plus an organization copyright? Like this: > > > > /* > > * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause > > * > > * Copyright (c) 2010-2019 Red Hat, Inc. > > * All rights reserved. > > */ > > > > It sounds funny to claim a license that grants rights to users, but yet > states "All rights reserved" that sounds like you are NOT granting > rights to others. These days, it has lost all legal significance, and > is merely adding noise: > https://www.iusmentis.com/copyright/allrightsreserved/ > > With BSD license, it is a historical accident of copy-and-paste; where > different upstream sources of the license differ on whether the phrase > is still part of the license: > > https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html > https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause > > Thus, I can overlook it for BSD files, but I hate seeing it on GPL > files, so I try to point it out whenever I notice it. I agree, skip the reserved bit, otherwise it's fine. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAl1v/FIACgkQ9TYGna5E T6AHNhAAnI2xz1TwgA2bUfal6DNPSuQ58oyychCLlrqVOPFj1z8TdFR8+TFwpcSf 4on43muhNMwUmwquw7FFFP4ESI0bC0LPRXsbpJk8zEgtkQ5Z5ZJ6GR8Ahj4KFFAu 9MYtZsXrIZzrCwOyDUW2P5Be881gVjklfGhCJMTkjI9xezuJX6a86OA+YuT8lLPP MtYql39wEilR6d6GIQ5D+su8da+kmcWuA2Yr7GBws78SGjh22JyRD2iQ3CYVfoL1 RdD9xIwaY9Ef7jk7sZrwFywUn0vYM7RzrvBqpUlwzCvLVhgonW+3M3ejxeQbdYXp 1f07xZ+1RFmeD6xozuoW/X4HNLmQtUc0uSHfpnVCd0MmRv4xs4ArpQ5PoGuiYw6P uklva3whHn7lq8QCyg/Juma8mIoIfA2e+S4ZIXeWKvvw6jmfmqfSyfeE2NogrpUv gnH7zSg2UZOuEVOI8q2M3WZm065bm+gsSy4cx+8NMRSvfxv10gsHs/9iEHkb2Eif LJxrfzOh9lCi26DwTAgqWeJefQ6kCmLq294wraWAloiPVbNDthMzCawbEjBZX8tU lKwUukcCryVyWSGTV6XuM9zjqj+GtFz2IDeEHNxCL296n6f1P98Ss4Q/zOnSI6Mf tZMyOm2rNh0rQWZynLrO9eFVnWNHJzPwzvNg1zd4kyvOT96ia8w= =us9U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----