Re: [PATCH] newlib: fix fseek optimization with SEEK_CUR
Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 9 17:28, Bastien Bouclet wrote: > The call to fflush was invalidating the read buffer, preventing relative > seeks to positions that would have been inside the read buffer from > being optimized. The call to srefill would then re-read mostly the same > data that was initially in the read buffer. > --- > newlib/libc/stdio/fseeko.c | 31 ++++++------------------------- > newlib/libc/stdio64/fseeko64.c | 31 ++++++------------------------- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) Pushed. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAl3SbmgACgkQ9TYGna5E T6ABZhAAlvFUSNNpd17aYEjyYtjb1W2MnvVnDmU2YxeLBkUxg3QIJlJjPu98mN4Y tP1qVM33tzHVOLAGspVzXPOeG+3cMQG4qSU41Yg1bFRhzIfh7qww25kutHsEq4Cy RjqPi6k+j6eOSm2QpEMyF/NNRUL7ru5RztB07fYRPlcaP6Jn7r73FU42PHwLpfQl XUFbcpvJOWGrIC2nvGVcvK1IDoUCCa7eNSWYck2XwpFm6AFmjBPnz1OtvQjSj9U1 TOm1GWiqBDFmv37EmRfmervjTRbkzEnUpbB1qzgj0svzUBQfZNaPGg8DIxGDgzMW L2gksb64bYcu9z4Ke/wVpga/+RcmQqvIfTTuMDqdapyXxLRtA5B15ToCpSRWsGQl ZQ+aVy2hSDtjc8b73ShRdWLL9DKPxVxuHq0SDKKnxxWuygAA4eJHTTe6eDKjft4B xuAwRUMnT8Y7oGlDDEgVAwTEq+Uw4RYr5EP0MLpv+6i13Ps4ptDlpemill88iDz1 G28bxay+CupWFD3VZt27KXNyOswXnmSK5VAnGZHNftkV8wEAmngbChQIT/yFO8zh Z1gSCvo4M1XhgksmBwKIT9GDFLsHANV06EHpDDL9eLTTb5FtIRABfJorUYvfQhGH 90YEYBmVxWhxTkLyKsqqU0+d6pnFA9Oe65CuSN6ZTBj1T0nY3xA= =DnA4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----