Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use remove-advertising-clause script to edit BSD licenses
Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jan 29 08:49, Keith Packard wrote: > Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]> writes: > > > This hunk looks wrong. We can fix this manually easily, but it > > would be great if this get catched by the script, right? > > Oh, I don't think we would want to ship the script; once we've run it, > it shouldn't be necessary going forward. So, if we can review the > results and fix up any minor mistakes by hand, that seems like a good > result. > > In this case, we probably cannot remove the advertising clause because I > don't have a statement from them changing their license. Ok, I pushed the changes with the questionable hunk removed. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEoVYPmneWZnwT6kwF9TYGna5ET6AFAl4xyS8ACgkQ9TYGna5E T6DSjhAAlsTI9GegiTY2aPYlWVhyK0mYJPtKUkxMRLVI1+Mz21cDwJd12qxaEEFV kxumlggznU0sJ8iFT490wEbO9wx1C/r+2oyjl/pjxFx5CfH+0wVHcxHfgonB1Llq YCz/pfw3sHwY+Urv4fzxJxEIz2aKmhXAUqG5D1fRWBh8lKk7jLH42KgWm+/4L7AT h32kUAxCENpv6ZJmpfZ9Vb3SxUOKa1EWVdx3FF/k5df7q+o72dc7pyv7gPtHwxaL gTy/dT2tMC1rUnmcHHbWDMce8KI7PQraSwJFYDCR8u1lCUWXCQjtOTHQbVBlMEFD 7gjnda3s6MwLEzGL+mMD9ZAdDzYnkl3W83Rj0UZLINIeX7jimhLaCkHNaCrdAo9Z rC3XqCPqEL+Pih3cZBdi5l5EpZFdHe5zQUS7jzowZwhAojGBZysSOAg7TRLlJP9u P5bM1NQRa/kOAGaI9+avSlvFxBKaVMGBGhp2f6UzpQfgK2qoqTSML2v0IRQ2j3ED +9jMKiHcsmtu9lUhOKmdIfnPutsWgg7LY276H35CeAbtFP5pfxBhgQHFS6/EqHXG 9GCGVNvqk80wgUUsqjPM9jh+IDaYoUP1YMY8vyd3srXufwS3bTlUq4yPgunGAx+/ RoWAvSAWjmhhhArEltlnBibOKxOWQAcjZ3jSeh/QhR6t29n9IsI= =myRV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----