Re: [PATCH 2/2] Use remove-advertising-clause script to edit BSD licenses

Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.newlib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Jan 29 08:49, Keith Packard wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > This hunk looks wrong.  We can fix this manually easily, but it
> > would be great if this get catched by the script, right?
> 
> Oh, I don't think we would want to ship the script; once we've run it,
> it shouldn't be necessary going forward. So, if we can review the
> results and fix up any minor mistakes by hand, that seems like a good
> result.
> 
> In this case, we probably cannot remove the advertising clause because I
> don't have a statement from them changing their license.

Ok, I pushed the changes with the questionable hunk removed.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=myRV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.