Re: [PATCH] Fix truncf for sNaN input
Joseph Myers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020, Keith Packard via Newlib wrote: > I was concerned with what NaN values are delivered from a NaN > operand, given the POSIX specification which says that the operand > itself shall be delivered if it is a NaN. I don't think POSIX specifications should be trusted for how functions should behave with sNaN inputs. Rather, prefer the specifications from TS 18661-1 (or the latest C2x draft which has TS 18661-1 integrated). -- Joseph S. Myers [email protected]