Re: [PATCH] Remove multiple defination error
Eshan Dhawan via Newlib <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAH5ZSWqxb_UBPRqdoGc==ozjPjSHHwmwyr2pYwiK8+7hso3gZg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 8:46 PM Sebastian Huber < [email protected]> wrote: > On 11/07/2020 00:41, Eshan dhawan wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Eshan dhawan<[email protected]> > > --- > > newlib/libm/machine/arm/fenv-vfp.c | 7 ++++- > > newlib/libm/machine/arm/fenv.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++----------- > > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > What are the design goals of this implementation? Should it work with > some sort of run time VFP detection? Should it select the support using > builtin defines? > It used the GCC flags to detect VPF if VPF is not selected all the symbols of vfp won't appear :) > > I would use builtin defines only and then just use a single file. > I tried converting into a single file but the file becomes too complex to handle and check for errors. :)