Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM with only 32-bit floats do not have fast 64-bit FMA
Szabolcs Nagy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The 08/10/2020 11:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Szabolcs,
>
> ok to push?
>
this looks ok.
i would have used the arm specific macros
( __ARM_FEATURE_FMA, __ARM_FP) directly
in arm specific code.
but using HAVE_FAST_FMA{F} works too.
(note that these macros currently only
do something useful on aarch64 and arm.)
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna
>
> On Aug 8 15:34, Keith Packard via Newlib wrote:
> > I added some new test configurations to my CI system for picolibc and
> > discovered that when the new math code was built on 32-bit ARM
> > processors with only single-precision floating hardware, several math
> > functions were returning imprecise results. I got the expected results
> > on processors with no FPU and on processors with both 32- and 64- bit
> > FPUs.
> >
> > I discovered that the affected functions were using the 'fma' function
> > on this hardware, even though (lacking 64-bit HW support), that
> > function was being emulated without the required precision.
> >
> > This all boiled down to math_config.h incorrectly detecting 64-bit FMA
> > support on ARM processors.
> >
> > This patch series contains three changes:
> >
> > 1. fix the fast FMA process so that 32-bit ARM processors without 64-bit FMA
> > support don't use 'fma' for the new math functions
> >
> > 2. Add detection of fast FMAF, which 32-bit ARM processors with only
> > 32-bit FPUs *do* support.
> >
> > 3. Add ARM versions of fma and fmaf which are used when those
> > instructions are available.
> >
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Maintainer
> Red Hat
>
--