Re: Fw: [PATCH 0/3] libm: Clean up gamma functions

Keith Packard via Newlib <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lib.newlib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Joseph Myers <[email protected]> writes:

> If infinity is an exact result and at least one 
> argument is infinite, there is no error or exception (unless it's some of 
> the new minimum/maximum operations in IEEE 754-2019 and the other argument 
> is a signaling NaN).

Thanks for the clarification. That all seems consistent, and I think I
can now (mostly) understand how the POSIX error values relate back to
the IEEE 754-2019 specification.

I do wonder if POSIX will add the new minimum/maximum operations; they
seem more like what I expect wrt NaN handling than the existing
minimumNumber/fmin maximumNumber/fmax operations.

Any other concerns about the testing values I'm using? Should we adopt
the newlib patches necessary to have it pass those tests?

-- 
-keith
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEw4O3eCVWE9/bQJ2R2yIaaQAAABEFAl9JW8MACgkQ2yIaaQAA
ABGiWA/8C7d3ijTQZAPGlomknNFNJbtB1HJy50NWUmtsNtuJkx20hSe3SIqDdYwr
ELouSEyiVkCd5NtZ6bDoW/xhbC678xxIo36DL7zvS4ZerdTNAxxNbFSURTFwYWdI
f22u3/wcg/LRHva+jzLNsIeOKIjf3U3NKA8n9GkH3+uUPN16iHzCC04E4zTAFvz6
kP9JmObDvlOSU3H6gD6X52+sDSHQyo9K8L5C88pPcZmHoJry2dp6USvF5Vgp95+t
zb3ualAcrhuOT8Tae4UwUsxESJYNb36uR3rfkylqjVF62JujRKECJXiq7kQvSy2/
AzuYCOllr6Uq52GAiaiW7tUfZEIaYmbGtG+S8Ofo/RdesGzAiYm68zBEmlOLreUZ
m57oq7ubLdT1PWTYBvTl9qM9imPWglOHxTE2O7OmcG0jvQ9BC6tV93+KVT+GwHKV
Ru0mXdLFctvQ27MapUvUbvqe134WiQiSXDvnGm4g+UP20wXNpiTFh27tzJVmo8GA
xYIQTluR7F54K8SM3BsOfIHEtpnqCc208Imln4UCdZD0QZffJItvZZKHBTjX1KEe
01g9qWKA5aLXyD2KiXOzJCX+mCXh5W1jnYBmwrY73KosvBLA5E25E3lysmWI6Ytl
GZVSFqQObDNfNExHH/SzD5ivnv++D3qFy6T9/O4/ekK3VbBwdxs=
=MktC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.