Re: Fw: [PATCH 0/3] libm: Clean up gamma functions
Keith Packard via Newlib <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Joseph Myers <[email protected]> writes: > If infinity is an exact result and at least one > argument is infinite, there is no error or exception (unless it's some of > the new minimum/maximum operations in IEEE 754-2019 and the other argument > is a signaling NaN). Thanks for the clarification. That all seems consistent, and I think I can now (mostly) understand how the POSIX error values relate back to the IEEE 754-2019 specification. I do wonder if POSIX will add the new minimum/maximum operations; they seem more like what I expect wrt NaN handling than the existing minimumNumber/fmin maximumNumber/fmax operations. Any other concerns about the testing values I'm using? Should we adopt the newlib patches necessary to have it pass those tests? -- -keith
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 832 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEw4O3eCVWE9/bQJ2R2yIaaQAAABEFAl9JW8MACgkQ2yIaaQAA ABGiWA/8C7d3ijTQZAPGlomknNFNJbtB1HJy50NWUmtsNtuJkx20hSe3SIqDdYwr ELouSEyiVkCd5NtZ6bDoW/xhbC678xxIo36DL7zvS4ZerdTNAxxNbFSURTFwYWdI f22u3/wcg/LRHva+jzLNsIeOKIjf3U3NKA8n9GkH3+uUPN16iHzCC04E4zTAFvz6 kP9JmObDvlOSU3H6gD6X52+sDSHQyo9K8L5C88pPcZmHoJry2dp6USvF5Vgp95+t zb3ualAcrhuOT8Tae4UwUsxESJYNb36uR3rfkylqjVF62JujRKECJXiq7kQvSy2/ AzuYCOllr6Uq52GAiaiW7tUfZEIaYmbGtG+S8Ofo/RdesGzAiYm68zBEmlOLreUZ m57oq7ubLdT1PWTYBvTl9qM9imPWglOHxTE2O7OmcG0jvQ9BC6tV93+KVT+GwHKV Ru0mXdLFctvQ27MapUvUbvqe134WiQiSXDvnGm4g+UP20wXNpiTFh27tzJVmo8GA xYIQTluR7F54K8SM3BsOfIHEtpnqCc208Imln4UCdZD0QZffJItvZZKHBTjX1KEe 01g9qWKA5aLXyD2KiXOzJCX+mCXh5W1jnYBmwrY73KosvBLA5E25E3lysmWI6Ytl GZVSFqQObDNfNExHH/SzD5ivnv++D3qFy6T9/O4/ekK3VbBwdxs= =MktC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----