Re: [PATCH] libgloss/aarch64: Add support for Armv8-R AArch64
"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 18/09/2020 15:43, Alex Coplan wrote: > Hello, > > This patch adds support for Armv8-R AArch64. We update the AArch64 CPU > boot code to work on Armv8-R if __ARM_ARCH_PROFILE is set to 'R'. > Armv8-R AArch64 has no EL3, so we don't set vbar_el3, and adjust the > code to set up the MPU for Armv8-R. > > We also add a specs file for use with Armv8-R AArch64 models. > > Testing: > * Ran AArch64 GCC testsuite using --with-arch=armv8-r together with the > new specs file and boot code in an Armv8-R AArch64 model. > * Ran newlib testsuite, no regressions. > > OK for master? > > Thanks, > Alex > > --- > > 2020-09-18 Alex Coplan <[email protected]> > > libgloss/ChangeLog: > > * aarch64/Makefile.in: Install new specs file. > * aarch64/cpu-init/Makefile.in: Also build boot code for Armv8-R. > * aarch64/cpu-init/rdimon-aem-el3.S: Add support for Armv8-R. > * aarch64/elf-aem-v8-r.specs: New. > The main problem I see with this is that it assumes that the compiler being used is *not* configured for a default CPU architecture of ARMv8-r. If it is, then the normal rdimon-aem-el3.o file will in fact become the same as the v8-r version, which is not really what we want. Perhaps, rather than hacking around the __ARM_ARCH_PROFILE setting you should just set things up to build the file twice, but with a different conventional pre-define set each time. R.