Type of memory advantage of the nano printf and malloc versions
"R. Diez via Newlib" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lib.newlib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all: Regarding the nano version of printf etc: ----8<----8<----8<---- -enable-newlib-nano-formatted-io This builds NEWLIB with a special implementation of formatted I/O functions, designed to lower the size of application on small systems with size constraint issues. ----8<----8<----8<---- I am guessing that this affects program space (ROM/flash), but not RAM usage, is that correct? I am not using stdio etc, only sprintf and the like. Regarding the nano version of malloc: ----8<----8<----8<---- --enable-newlib-nano-malloc NEWLIB has two implementations of malloc family's functions, one in `mallocr.c' and the other one in `nano-mallocr.c'. This options enables the nano-malloc implementation, which is for small systems with very limited memory. ----8<----8<----8<---- I am guessing that this affects mainly program space (ROM/flash), but does it need less RAM too? Much less, or a little less? I have one target with 8 KiB, but another one with more than 80 KiB RAM. Given that the nano malloc currently has memory fragmentation issues, if I have understood the last, recent discussion about it correctly, I wonder whether the nano malloc makes sense if the target has plenty of ROM/flash memory, which is the case on my boards. Thanks in advance, rdiez